Author Archives: Mark Schulte

A Downturn is Not the Time For Caution

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

“I should have seen the crisis coming earlier.” – Jean-Paul Agon

I was reading a recent interview in the Wall Street Journal with L’Oreal CEO Jean-Paul Agon. The article’s beginning states “First-half net profit at the world’s largest cosmetics company fell 14% after decades of at least 10% annual increases…Chief Executive Jean-Paul Agon is scrambling to fix L’Oréal.”

I was not surprised to see later in the article that Algon said “This year I’m very cautious. I learned my lesson.” L’Oreal management, like most companies, was surprised by the severity of the recession and vast impact on the world’s economies and on their product sales.

The question I ask now is: Will “being cautious” slow the recovery of his company and to a greater extent the economies of the rest of the world? Possibly. Not because I am overly optimistic (being a “finance guy” that isn’t actually possible), but because this isn’t a time for executives to over-react.

My position is to get the right data and let the data provide the guidance. The best data is going to come from our sales and marketing teams—not those historical models based on shipments that have been used by operations to build inventory. I think this was the key data input that was missing to L’Oreal and its executives. With good bottoms-up sales forecasting, they may have picked up the early signals leading to a significant downturn with enough time not to be caught by surprise. Picking up the signals leading to an upturn will also ensure they fully take advantage of the inevitable upturn when it occurs.

If you connect your real-time sales forecast to your production operations, you will reduce inventory, obsolescence, stock outs and improve on time delivery, customer satisfaction and financial efficiency. I think an automated sales forecast could help Mr. Agon scramble less in times of great volatility.

Income Shouldn’t Soften the Blow of a Missed Forecast

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

“Dear Stockholder: We missed our revenue forecast, but it is okay because we made more income. Please don’t be mad.” Is this really an acceptable position for companies to take? Why do companies miss their own revenue forecasts?

In a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, Pepsi Bottling Group Inc. announced an increase in profits, despite missing its forecast.

Over my career, I have created many revenue forecasts including when I worked at Western Digital and WebEx Communications. The last thing I would ever do is say that forecasts can’t be wrong.

But, are companies using the best tools and practices available to reduce the risk of a bad forecast? Most companies have not kept up with the changes in technology and still use Microsoft Excel to build complex volume, price and mix models based on complicated assumptions and variables to estimate a range of outcomes. Unfortunately, these models usually leave out the most important contributor to the amount of revenue to be generated — the “sales force” — and are usually out of date as soon as they are created.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it isn’t that businesspeople aren’t smart enough to realize that the sales team is extremely valuable due to their proximity to the ultimate customer. The problem is that the back end of the business doesn’t have a tool that gives them real-time visibility into customer demand.

That was until Right90 came up with an on-demand application that takes the input of each salesperson, by customer, by product, by geography and tracks the changes in volume, price and mix in real-time.

Imagine the potential savings: reduced inventory and obsolescence, improved on-time delivery and in-full delivery, reduced stock-outs and premium freight just to name a few.